Tuzomyi
Tuzomyi savings workshops
enrolling now
Tuzomyi team working together on savings plan workshops
The people behind Tuzomyi

Practitioners who plan, not just teach

Every person on this team has spent time working directly with savings frameworks — building them, stress-testing them, and explaining them to people at very different starting points. That background shapes how the workshops are structured.

Since 2020, the team has grown from 3 specialists to 11, each brought in for a specific gap in the program — not to fill a headcount.

Who runs the workshops

WK

Witold Karpowicz

Lead Program Architect

Witold designed the core savings plan curriculum used across all 6 workshop modules. He spent 9 years as a personal finance consultant before moving into education full-time, and that shift is visible in how he frames problems — always from the participant's actual situation, not a textbook scenario.

Curriculum design
AZ

Aldona Żurawska

Workshop Facilitator

Aldona leads the interactive exercises across 4 of the program's modules, focusing on the parts where participants tend to get stuck — specifically the gap between understanding a savings principle and actually applying it to their own numbers. She runs 3 to 4 live sessions per month.

Live facilitation
RN

Radosław Niemiec

Financial Tools Specialist

Radosław builds and maintains the calculation tools participants use during exercises — spreadsheet templates, scenario planners, and the interactive budget tracker introduced in 2023. He also reviews all numerical examples in the materials to make sure they reflect realistic Polish household figures.

Tools & resources
MB

Monika Brzeska

Participant Support Lead

Monika handles the support side — questions between sessions, onboarding for first-time participants, and follow-up after each module. She tracks which parts of the program generate the most questions and feeds that back into how the materials are updated each quarter.

Support & feedback
PW

Paweł Wierzbicki

Regional Outreach Coordinator

Paweł manages access and participation for learners outside major urban centres — adapting session timing, connectivity options, and materials for participants in regions where internet quality or scheduling constraints differ from the average. He works directly with 14 partner institutions across Poland.

Regional access
EK

Elżbieta Kowalczyk

Content Reviewer

Elżbieta reviews every new material before it goes live — checking that examples are accurate, language is plain enough for someone with no prior finance background, and that nothing contradicts what was taught in an earlier module. Each update cycle takes roughly 3 weeks of her time.

Quality review

How the team prepares each workshop cycle

Each new cycle goes through a fixed sequence before participants see anything. The steps below reflect what actually happens — not an idealized process description.

1

Review previous cycle

Support logs and participant questions from the last 8 weeks are analyzed to identify recurring gaps in understanding.

2

Update materials

Content changes are drafted — typically 2 to 5 pages per module — then reviewed by Elżbieta before anything is finalized.

3

Rebuild tools

Radosław adjusts the calculation templates and scenario planners to reflect any changes in the updated material.

4

Facilitator run-through

Aldona and Witold run a dry session internally — timing each exercise and flagging anything that feels unclear before participants join.

5

Regional check

Paweł confirms session scheduling and access options are workable for participants in lower-connectivity regions before the cycle opens.

What guides how this team works

These aren't posted values — they're patterns that showed up consistently when the team reflected on what made sessions actually useful versus sessions that felt complete but left participants uncertain about next steps.

11 specialists across curriculum, facilitation, tools, support and regional access

Specificity over completeness

A session that covers 3 concepts well is more useful than one that covers 8 superficially. The team regularly removes content that doesn't earn its place in the schedule.

Feedback changes things

Participant questions are treated as signals, not noise. If the same question appears more than twice in a cycle, the material that prompted it gets rewritten — not just answered in support.

Access is part of the design

A workshop that works well in Warsaw but is difficult to follow from Podkarpacie hasn't been designed properly. Regional usability is checked before every cycle, not after problems appear.

Honest about what takes time

Building a savings habit takes months, not one workshop. The team is direct about that timeline with participants from the first session — because mismatched expectations are one of the most common reasons people disengage.